iosr-jpte   Volume-9 ~ Issue-4 ~ Jul. – Aug. 2022

[1]. Luo, Q.; Fang, X.; Liu, L.; Yang, C.; Sun, Y. Automated Visual Defect Detection for Flat Steel Surface: A Survey. IEEE Trans.
[2]. Instrum. Meas. 2020, 69, 626–644. [CrossRef]
[3]. Thomas, G.B.; Jenkins, M.S.; Mahapatra, R.B. Investigation of strand surface defects using mould instrumentation and modelling.
[4]. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2004, 31, 485–494. [CrossRef]
[5]. Shi, T.; Kong, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z.; Zheng, G. Improved Sobel algorithm for defect detection of rail surfaces with enhanced efficiency and accuracy. J. Cent. South Univ. 2016, 23, 2867–2875. [CrossRef].

[1]. Sasser, P.E. 1992. The physics of fiber strength. pp. 19-28. In: C.R. Benedict (ed.). Proc. Cotton Fiber Cellulose: Structure, Function, and Utilization Conference. National Cotton Council, Memphis Tenn.
[2]. Gutheri, D., M. Watson, and K. Hake (1993). The 1993 cotton crop quality trends. Cotton physiology today. Newsletter, National Cotton Council of America, November-December 1993, vol. 5(10).
[3]. Bunsell, A.R.(2018). Handbook of Properties of Textile and Technical Fibres (https://books.google.com/books?id=ICosDwAAQBAJ). Woodhead Publishing. p. 225. ISBN 978-008-101886-6.
[4]. Kim, H.J.; Delhom, C.D. Rodgers, J.M. and Jones, D.C. (2019) Effect of Fiber Maturity on Bundle and Single- Fiber Strength of Upland Cotton.Crop Sci. 59:115–124.
[5]. Siddiqui MQ, Wang H, Memon H (2020). Cotton Fiber Testing. In Cotton Science and Processing Technology (pp. 99-119). Springer, Singapore.

[1]. Abdel-Ghaffar, E.A.F., Hammam G.Y.M., El-Hosary A.A.A., El-Gedwy E.M.M. and Hassan A.A. Influence of some commercial blends between the imported cotton and the upper Egyptian varieties on technological properties. Annals of Agic. Sci.,Moshtohor, 57(1):31-38, (2019).
[2]. Ahmed, S.; M. Syduzzaman; Mohmud, S. andRahman, M.M.Comparative study on ring, rotor and jetring spun yarn. European. European Scientific Journal,Vol.(11): 411-424,(2015).
[3]. Almetwally, A.A.,Mourad,M.M. Hebeish, A.A.andRamadan, M.A.Comparison between physical properties of ring spun yarn and compact yarns spun from different pneumatic compacting systems. Indian Journal of Fiber &Textile Research. Pp. 40:43-50, (2015).[4]. Altas, S and Kadoglu, H.Comparison of conventional ring, mechanical compact and pneumatic compact yarn spinning systems.Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 7 (1): 87-100, (2012).
[5]. ASTM, American Society for Testing and Materials. Standards of Textile Testing and Materials. D1425-96, (1996).

[1]. Abd-Elkawe, E.Y. and Aly, N.M. (2019). Comparative study of quality properties for open-end yarns produced from blending natural and synthetic fibers. Journal of the Textile Association. 423-430.
[2]. Abd-Elkawe, E.Y. and El-Sayed, E.R. (2021) .Production of Fine Count Yarns from Some Extra-long Egyptian Cottons on Different Spinning Systems.European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences.3 (5):90-96.
[3]. Arafa H. M. (2009) .Comparative study on spinning potential and yarn quality of promising crosses and some Egyptian cotton cultivars. Ph.D, Thesis, Fac. of Agric. Cairo Univ., Egypt.
[4]. Arafa H. M. (2019). Producing yarns from blends of card wastes, recycled fabric and medium quality cotton. Bull. Fac . Agric., Cairo Univ., 70: 453-460
[5]. ASTM (1993). American Society for Testing and Materials. Standards of Textile Testing and Materials. (D 1578 -93). USA.